<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VideoStory News &#187; production company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://videostory.com/wp/tag/production-company/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://videostory.com/wp</link>
	<description>A Web 2.0 Communications Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fellow Producers, Wake Up! A Beer Company is your Newest Competitor</title>
		<link>http://videostory.com/wp/2006/08/fellow-producers-wake-up-a-beer-company-is-your-newest-competitor/</link>
		<comments>http://videostory.com/wp/2006/08/fellow-producers-wake-up-a-beer-company-is-your-newest-competitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The AV Biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anheuser-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio-visuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Busch Creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miller Brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videostory.com/wp/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The A-B production company apparently will specialize in short sit-coms and humor pieces. That's what is selling on the web, so that's what they're going after.
They--and everyone else. If it's funny it must be good, must move product, and  must be worth investing millions in to be able to self-produce. Not always.
Corporations have done their own printing, training videos, and PowerPoints for decades. But this new approach is like taking brand identity or image advertising in-house. In the short term, it works. But eventually inside politics wins over outside objectivity-- and out goes the advertising to someone who can provide more of a world view. What goes around....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What goes around comes around&#8211; and around, and around.</p>
<p>Anheuser Busch, <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=111379">according to this article in Ad Age</a>, is getting into the short form content business&#8211; IE, web videos, virals, videos, etc.</p>
<p>Those of us who&#8217;ve been in video a long time have learned that today&#8217;s client can be tomorrow&#8217;s competitor. Many major corporations created in-house production companies as an economic move once they were producing high volumes of av communications.</p>
<p>But that was a reaction to cost, and much of the creative element&#8211; scripts, direction&#8211; was still sourced from the outside.</p>
<p>The web is changing that. The sheer volume of opportunity&#8211; combined with a mass marketing of video production tools&#8211; means the experienced video or multimedia producer is now competing with Ad Agencies, design firms, in-house departments, PR firms, and the marketing director&#8217;s cousin who has a camcorder.</p>
<p></p>
<p><span id="more-78"></span></p>
<p>The A-B production company apparently will specialize in short sit-coms<br />
and humor pieces. That&#8217;s what is selling on the web, so that&#8217;s what<br />
they&#8217;re going after.</p>
<p>They&#8211;and everyone else. If it&#8217;s funny it<br />
must be good, must move product, and&nbsp; must be worth investing millions<br />
in to be able to self-produce. Not always.</p>
<p>Corporations have done their own<br />
printing, training videos, and PowerPoints for decades. But this new approach is<br />
like taking brand identity or image advertising in-house. In the short<br />
term, it works. But eventually inside politics wins over outside<br />
objectivity&#8211; and out goes the advertising to someone who can provide<br />
more of a world view. What goes around&#8230;.</p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t to say<br />
this move by Busch won&#8217;t work. A little known fact is that A-B has<br />
owned and operated a major meeting production company&#8211; Busch Creative,<br />
since the 1980&#8242;s. They&#8217;re successful, independent, and know how to move<br />
audiences.</p>
<p><strong>But this may be the exception that proves the rule.</strong><br />
When new people enter the production realm, they often define<br />
themselves via the equipment, not the content, The first questions one<br />
producer asks another is, &quot;What cameras do you use? Mac or PC? Avid or<br />
FInal Cut?&quot;</p>
<p>
Those aren&#8217;t the right questions. The<strong> right questions </strong>involve intent, audience, and result. Saving money on production costs won&#8217;t make those questions go away. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://videostory.com/wp/2006/08/fellow-producers-wake-up-a-beer-company-is-your-newest-competitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.330 seconds -->

